Friday, October 6, 2017

A Business Killing Lack Of Social Media Strategy?


Social media seems to be the best thing to happen to small businesses.

It is essentially a free tool that almost everyone is using, a factor that can be a benefit and a curse..



Businesses of all sizes can now create major marketing campaigns on shoestring budgets.

However, some businesses are killing their brand with poor marketing materials and no marketing strategy.

They fail to develop a strategy behind their posting, refuse to invest in quality graphics and don't engage with their community. They may not see a direct decline in business, but the energy spent posting content is not generating new prospects because people are looking at ill-conceived marketing — and deciding NOT to engage. (Ouch!)

There are a handful of essential elements that need to work together for your social media strategy to connect with your target market and generate quality leads for your business.

Make sure your social media strategy isn't suffering from these common mistakes:



Cheap Or Ugly Graphics

We live in a visual society where people like to look at pretty pictures. Even if they don't read your content, immediate assumptions are made about your business based on the graphics you use. There are several free and low-cost platforms that allow you to create and edit photos and videos for social media posting.

You may not have a lot of time or a staffer to dedicate to this task, but at least one or two hours should be carved out each week to develop content for your marketing. If you're a solopreneur, you may be thinking you don't have time to do this. My question is, do you have so much business that you don't need new clients?

No Design Consistency

Is your business traditional, modern or contemporary? Is your target audience youthful or experienced? Are your products/services designed for corporate consumers or household consumption? Believe it or not, those elements should make a difference when designing your social media images and messages. When someone looks at your images, reads your messages or watches your videos, they are trying to determine if this product/service is talking to them. It is important for viewers to see your content and become intrigued enough to click the link, request more information or call for an appointment. If you are getting a lot of views but few clicks, there is something in your messaging that is not connecting with your audience.



No Content Consistency

Posting consistently on social media can be draining, but if you choose to use it as a part of your marketing strategy, it is something that you need to do so strategically.

Failure to do so makes your brand seem disengaged. Even if you only post once a day or every few days, that helps to show that you are taking a step to remain connected to your audience. Not sure what to post? Don't let that ruin your schedule. You could:

• Link to articles that may provide helpful information to your community.
• Share inspirational quotes.
• Ask a question that can help in the research and development of your next product/service.
• Ask for reviews of a current product/service.
• Feature a profile of a member of your team.



No Connection With Your Community

I am amazed at the number of businesses who fail to connect with their community. I see them posting ads, offers, advice and you name it with people commenting and asking questions — but no response from the business. Inevitably, the consumers begin talking to each other, which seems to derail the conversation away from the business.

Even if you don't have the resources to dedicate to a community manager, someone within your organization should be tasked with monitoring and following up on the information that you post. If you are a one-man shop and getting a high level of engagement, congratulations because you're doing something right — but the next step is to convert those leads into sales.

Likes and comments are warm leads because these are people who have expressed some interest in what you're offering. Now, you must figure out through engagement what it will take to get them to buy. Not responding or leaving them to find the answer themselves is a poor lead-conversion strategy. You would not do that to someone outside your office building trying to get in the door, so why do it to someone trying to gain virtual access to you?



No Investment To Reach Your Target Audience

Let's face it: Just because you build it or post it, they are not going to come. You need to go out and find them. Because so many social media platforms are free, many business owners have failed to allocate financial resources to effectively reaching their target audience, causing their message to fall on deaf ears. You can have great images, great content and be on standby to connect with your community, but if you have not invested in reaching your target demographic, then you have essentially wasted many of your resources.

In theory, social media is the great equalizer for many industries. It gives businesses of all sizes the potential to connect with their target customers all over the globe. However, doing so requires a strategy to engage prospects and a plan to follow up with those who seem interested in your offer. Not making an investment of time or finances into your social media can be killing your business, but using social strategically can be an asset to untold growth.

Guest Authored By LaKesha Womack. LaKesha is a Published Author, International Speaker, Politcal Strategist and Business/Marketing Consultant at Womack Consulting Group. Follow LaKesha on Twitter.




Unlike traditional media advertising that can be very hit or miss, many social media ads are targeted and often allow you to pay per click so you are only spending money when prospects engage with your content.

Start small to see which platforms and message-types your audience is most likely to engage with, and then build from there.." -LaKesha Womack

    • Authored by:
      Fred Hansen Pied Piper of Social Media Marketing at YourWorldBrand.com & CEO of Millennium 7 Publishing Co. in Loveland, Colorado. I work deep in the trenches of social media strategy, community management and trends.  My interests include; online business educator, social media marketing, new marketing technology, skiing, hunting, fishing and The Rolling Stones..-Not necessarily in that order ;)

    Thursday, October 5, 2017

    Digital & Social Media News Trends?


    Digital news and social media continue to grow, with mobile devices rapidly becoming one of the most common ways for Americans to get news..


    As journalists and media practitioners gather for the annual Online News Association conference, here are 10 key findings from recent Pew Research Center reports about today’s digital news media landscape:

    1. The Gap Between Television and Online News Consumption is Narrowing

    As of August 2017, 43% of Americans report often getting news online, a share just 7 percentage points lower than the 50% who often get news on television. The gap between the two news platforms was 19 points in early 2016, more than twice as large.

    The share of Americans who often get news from TV – whether from local TV news, nightly network TV news or cable news – has fallen, while the portion of Americans often getting news online – either from news websites/apps or social media – has grown.




    2. Use of Mobile Devices News Continues to Grow

    As of spring 2017, 45% of U.S. adults often get news on a mobile device</a>, up from 36% in 2016 and 21% in 2013. The use of desktop or laptop computers for news remains steady, with 31% saying they often get news this way. In all, 85% of Americans ever get news on a mobile device, the same proportion who do so on a desktop computer. And, among those who get news both ways, mobile devices are increasingly preferred. Nearly two-thirds (65%) of U.S. adults who get news on both mobile and desktop prefer mobile, up from 56% in 2016.



    3. Older Adults are Driving the Growth in Mobile News Use

    More than eight-in-ten U.S. adults (85%) now get news on a mobile device, up from 72% in 2016. The recent surge has mainly come from growth among older Americans. Roughly two-thirds (67%) of those ages 65 and older now get news on a mobile device, a 24-percentage-point jump from 2016 and about three times the share in 2013. Mobile news use also grew among those ages 50 to 64, with about eight-in-ten (79%) now getting news on mobile, about double the share from 2013. Large increases in mobile news use also occurred among those in lower-income households.


    Related Article: Media Company Social Media?


    4. Two-Thirds of Americans (67%) Get at Least Some News on Social Media

    This represents a modest increase from 62% in 2016, but similar to mobile, this growth was driven by substantial increases among older Americans. For the first time in Pew Research Center surveys, more than half (55%) of Americans ages 50 and older report getting news on social media sites, a 10-percentage-point jump from 2016. Three of the social media sites measured – Twitter, YouTube and Snapchat – grew their shares of users who get news on their site. Twitter saw the largest growth in 2017 (up 15 percentage points) and had the largest share of users to report getting news there (74%).




    5. Nonwhites and the Less Educated Increasingly Say They Get News on Social Media

    About three-quarters of nonwhites (74%) get news on social media sites, up from 64% in 2016. This means that nonwhites (including all racial and ethnic groups, except non-Hispanic white) are now more likely than whites (64%) to get news on social media. Social media news use also increased to 69% in 2017 among those with less than a bachelor’s degree, surpassing those with a college degree or higher (63%).




    6. Many Americans Believe Fabricated News is Sowing Confusion, and about a third (32%) Say They Often See Made-Up Political News Online

    Nearly two-thirds of U.S. adults (64%) say fabricated news stories cause a great deal of confusion about the basic facts of current issues and events. About a third of U.S. adults (32%) say they often see made-up political news online, while 39% sometimes see such stories and 26% hardly ever or never do. About half (51%) say they often see political news online that is at least somewhat inaccurate – a higher proportion than those who say they see news that is almost completely made up (32%). About a quarter (23%) say they have ever shared made-up news stories themselves, with roughly equal shares saying they have done so either knowingly or unknowingly. A large majority (84%) of Americans say they are at least somewhat confident in their ability to recognize fabricated news.




    7. Americans Have Low Trust in Information From Social Media

    Just 5% of web-using U.S. adults have a lot of trust in the information they get from social media, nearly identical to the 4% who said so in 2016. This level of trust is much lower than trust in national and local news organizations, and in information coming from friends and family. In fact, in a separate study focusing on science news about twice as many social media users distrust science posts on social media as trust them (52% compared with 26%, 21% of social media users do not see any science posts).




    8. Social Media and Direct Visits to News Organizations Websites are the Most Common Pathways to Online News

    When asked how they arrived at news content in their most recent web interaction, online news consumers were about equally likely to say they got news by going directly to a news website (36% of the times they got news, on average) as they were to say they got it through social media (35%). They were less likely to access news through emails, text messages or search engines.

    While social media is a common pathway to news, when people follow news links, source recognition is lower for news accessed through these platforms than it is when the link comes from a news organization.

    When news links came directly from a news organization’s emails, texts or alerts, the individual could name a source for that link 78% of the time. That far outpaced source recall when a link came through social media (52% of such instances) or a friend’s email or text (50%).




    9. Online News That Comes Via Emails and Texts From Friends or Family is the Type of News Encounter Most Likely to Result in a Follow-Up Action

    Among the five pathways studied, news instances spurred by emails and texts from friends or family elicited the most activity; nearly three-quarters (73%) of these instances were acted upon in some way. That outpaced social media and direct visits to a news organization’s website, where a follow-up action occurred in about half of news instances (53% and 47%, respectively).

    Overall, talking with someone offline, whether in person or over the phone, was the most common action taken with digital news.


    10. An Analysis of Nearly 2700 Different Search Terms Associated With the Water in Flint, Michigan, Shows That Online Searches Can be a Good Proxy For the Public's Interest, Concerns or Intentions

    The data revealed that residents of Flint were searching for information about their water before the government recognized the contamination and before local and regional news media coverage intensified beyond a handful of stories related to the initial switch of the water supply.

    While news was the first type of information people searched for, questions about personal and public health implications soon came to the forefront. The politics of the water crisis – which involved the governor of Michigan, the city of Flint and several agencies – did not resonate as a local search topic until President Barack Obama reacted, when the story spread nationally.




    Guest Authored By Kristen Bialik & Katerina Eva Matsa. Kristen Bialik is a research assistant at Pew Research Center. Katerina Eva Matsa is a senior researcher focusing on journalism research at Pew Research Center.




    Digital news and social media continue to grow, with mobile devices rapidly becoming one of the most common ways for Americans to get news.."

      • Authored by:
        Fred Hansen Pied Piper of Social Media Marketing at YourWorldBrand.com & CEO of Millennium 7 Publishing Co. in Loveland, Colorado. I work deep in the trenches of social media strategy, community management and trends.  My interests include; online business educator, social media marketing, new marketing technology, skiing, hunting, fishing and The Rolling Stones..-Not necessarily in that order ;)

      Tuesday, October 3, 2017

      Do Social Media Cheaters Prosper?


      I remember watching Lance Armstrong storm up a mountain during Stage 13 of the 2003 Tour de France only to get his handlebar caught on a spectator’s jacket and flip over..

      He untangled himself from the wreck, got back on his bike and ascended that mountain at a pace that seemed out of this world — and it turned out it was..



      With nearly 3 billion social media users worldwide – growing at an astonishing rate of more than one million per day – social media influencers have a large megaphone for impacting the world.

      The top 10 most followed celebrities on Instagram — including Selena Gomez, Beyonce and Cristiano Ronaldo – collectively amass an estimated 954 million followers. That kind of power brings enormous responsibility.

      Unfortunately, some folks on social networks have started to game the system for profit, primarily by buying fake accounts. An influencer can easily buy up to 100,000 more followers for a few hundred dollars on Instaboostgram, a small price to pay to significantly increase one’s rate and reel in premium brand sponsors.

      With influencer marketing steadily becoming a multi-billion dollar industry, the temptation to cheat is real. It offers entirely new income streams with attractive global brands and lets young entrepreneurs raise their profiles on the world’s largest stage.



      But the fallout is already tangible.

      According to a study of millions of Instagram accounts conducted by my company, Fohr Card, nearly 10 percent of influencers buy followers to inflate their numbers, meaning nearly $80 million could already be wasted in brand dollars this year. If what these early warning signs show is left unchecked, deceptive practices could ruin social media’s promise of becoming a respected and authentic brand activation channel.

      No one likes being duped. When the US Anti-Doping Agency published 1,000 pages of damning evidence against Lance Armstrong in 2012, the athlete lost eight sponsors in one day -- including Nike, his longest supporter since 1996.

      A recent study reported that as much as 20 percent of total digital ad spend was wasted last year. So advertisers heavily consider follower count as the best gauge for reach. But solely relying on this metric is risky without proper policing, and no one wants to be the brand that partners with a Lance Armstrong.

      Luckily, our industry can self-regulate as more sophisticated technologies emerge to tackle tougher problems. By taking on a fervent commitment to preserving influencers’ integrity, we put ourselves in a prime position to rid the category of bad actors before it’s too late. Left unchecked, brands could begin to lose trust in influencers and potentially leave influencer marketing as an engagement channel and allocate their dollars elsewhere.



      Here are a few additional solutions:

      Raise The Bar

      A commitment to authenticity is the first step to fighting fraud. It’s time to weed out the cheats and prop up the real stars who have organically built solid followings over the years through hard work and high-quality content.

      The practice of buying fake followers needs to be condemned and stopped by brands, influencers and the agencies that service them.

      It’s imperative to raise public awareness of deceptive practices now so that stakeholders across the ecosystem know what to look out for and can incrementally address the issues. Dialogue around inauthentic accounts hasn’t gone mainstream but I see it becoming a robust topic in op-eds and conference panels in the future.

      Guest Authored By James Nord. James is the CEO and Co-Founder of Fohr Card, an Influencer Marketing Platform that connects Brands and Influencers. Follow James on Twitter.




      The practice of buying fake followers needs to be condemned and stopped by brands, influencers and the agencies that service them.

      It’s imperative to raise public awareness of deceptive practices now so that stakeholders across the ecosystem know what to look out for and can incrementally address the issues.

      Dialogue around inauthentic accounts hasn’t gone mainstream but I see it becoming a robust topic in op-eds and conference panels in the future.."

        • Authored by:
          Fred Hansen Pied Piper of Social Media Marketing at YourWorldBrand.com & CEO of Millennium 7 Publishing Co. in Loveland, Colorado. I work deep in the trenches of social media strategy, community management and trends.  My interests include; online business educator, social media marketing, new marketing technology, skiing, hunting, fishing and The Rolling Stones..-Not necessarily in that order ;)